MD5: 1d62d6106552649ab625494370d371d3
Base64: VHJ1dGggaXMgYmVhdXR5LCBiZWF1dHkgaXMgdHJ1dGguIA==
Those two statements are not the same. Of course if you knew how to crack the second one, you would of figured that out by testing the first one.
Lets go into a quantum theory that doesn’t exist. A complicated rational thought process needlessly complicated by an undeveloped idea.
Binary sounds complicated, but it’s not. In fact knowing it is completely irrelevant to my theory. To make things easier think of “0=_” and “1=-“.
Here is the story
11111111; 11111111; 10101010; 00100101; 00000000
Translated:
——–; ——–; –_-_-_-_; __-__-_-; 00000000
So now we will split this string up, we have two different stories now.
Split value:
String A: 00000000; 000000000; 000000000; 00000001
String B: 00000000; 000000000; 000000000; 00000001
However in this system actual values do not account for appearance which effects other strings.
Appearance:
String A: 11110111; 11111011; 11110011; 11110111;
String B: 11111011; 11110111; 11110101; 11101111;
So now we have a bunch of useless information, along with a doubled amount of useful information. We have JUST as much useless information directly correlated to the useful information. The useful information is not with in appearance, but with in actual value. Only by observing the actual value can the useless information be tossed away, and the real information can be recombined as hexadecimal.
FF;FF;FF;FF
Four times the valuable information originally had by the single strand condensed in the same amount of space.
This is just an idea and a metaphor; none of this would be applicable mathematically. Mainly because there is nothing to apply; it’s just a statement. I am sure no one will understand it in the first place, so you can give up trying now.